But some experts suggest it may be time for a change. Single-gender education and the often-spirited dialogue surrounding it have raised a number of issues concerning the best manner to educate boys and girls.
At the same time, issues of educational equity, whether based in gender, ethnicity, or social class, have been associated with a pushback against coeducation. Many comparisons have been made in many countries to test whether there is an advantage to one gender context or another, yet the conclusions remain under dispute.
Outcomes most frequently assessed are mathematics, science, and verbal performance and attitudes; educational aspirations; gender stereotyping; and self-concept. In the United States, single-sex public options, whether in one classroom or in an entire school, have increased as a result in changes in federal education regulations.
Those same regulations, which preclude random assignment, make it difficult to make an appropriate comparison of the outcomes in relation to different gender contexts.
Major areas of contention are that in many cases, the single-sex class or school may be different in ways that go beyond gender, and that the students and their families who choose a single-sex option may vary in crucial ways, such as having a higher- than-average commitment to education.
Single sex schools research paper of the reviews of the literature to date that encompass research from across the globe are considered to show little to no difference or are deemed inconclusive or contradictory.
Research from schools in which random assignment was conducted, if possible, or that employ statistical or methodological controls to account for preexisting differences or confounding factors may help resolve the controversy.
Popular views of gender and single-sex education as important determinants of student success are, however, in conflict with the results of research showing little difference and much inconsistency.
General Overviews There are few general resources to help understand the theory and research surrounding the disputes over single-sex education. Some of the papers in the Reference Works and Anthologies sections can also serve as an overview, but those tend to be more technical and specialized.
The works in this section were chosen for their broader assessment of the issue from multiple sides and with historical context.
LibenRiordanand Salomone spanned the largest historical periods, whereas Gill Australia and Bigler and Signorella United States focused mostly on the 20th century. The historical perspectives help in understanding the roots of single-sex education across cultures and why single-sex education began to decline in popularity before experiencing a resurgence.
Bigler and Signorella attempts to quantify the increases in single-sex classes and schools in the United States and cites several reasons for the increases, including concerns about gender equity and poor educational outcomes in schools serving low-income youth of color.
Although sympathetic to educational equity issues, they were not convinced that there is empirical support for gender-separated schools or classrooms. RiordanRiordanand Salomone are proponents of single-sex education, although not necessarily for all students.
Riordan and Salomone have the most extensive discussion of the arguments that members of disadvantaged groups may benefit from single-sex schooling.
Riordan provides an overview of all justifications in support of single-sex schools but questions the value of single-sex classes within mixed-sex schools.
Liben scrutinizes the disagreements from the perspectives of science and of values. She reviewed some of the most frequently cited works that take a gender-essentialist approach.
Liben also identified choice as another key value mentioned by promoters of single-sex education and discussed the clashes that occur when these different types of evidence e. The radio debate between Hyde and Sax in is illustrative of the challenge in reconciling the views. New perspectives and evidence on a continuing controversy.A Brief Note On Wikipedia Single Sex Education Essay - According to Wikipedia single-sex education is the practice of conducting education where male and female students attend separate classes or in separate buildings or schools.
Type or paste a DOI name into the text box. Click Go. Your browser will take you to a Web page (URL) associated with that DOI name.
Send questions or comments to doi. Single sex schools essay research paper Money in sports essay longer chapter methodology dissertation tense research paper fashion x-ray technician. Essay about united nations organization zones essay introductory words tone essay about psychologist food recipeTopic friendship essay problem solution.
Single-Sex Education: Pros and Cons What is the Status of Research Findings Related to Single-Sex Education? Research has focused on two major matters: (1) the relevance of male-female differences as a Single-sex schools, student achievement, and course selection: Evidence from rule-based student assignments in Trinidad and Tobago.
Sex education may be taught informally, such as when someone receives information from a conversation with a parent, friend, religious leader, or through the media. It may also be delivered through sex self-help authors, magazine advice columnists, sex columnists, or sex education web monstermanfilm.com sex education occurs when schools or health care providers offer sex education.
No evidence shows that single-sex education works or is better for girls than coeducation. When elements of a good education are present—such as small classes and schools, equitable teaching practices, and focused academic curriculum—girls and boys succeed.